RequirementsBase — MCP-native regulatory gap-analysis agent
Chapters

Category X — The actual "raw law -> requirements" competitors (the real fight)

Ascent RegTech (ascentregtech.com): patented AI extracts each obligation from rulebooks as structured objects (MiFID II in 2.5 min). Genuine extraction but output = legal obligatio
RequirementsBase — MCP-native regulatory gap-analysis agentrawChapter 6 of 9
  • Ascent RegTech (ascentregtech.com): patented AI extracts each obligation from rulebooks as structured objects (MiFID II in 2.5 min). Genuine extraction but output = legal obligations, no Jira/dev done-vs-gap.
  • CUBE (cube.global): "Automated Regulatory Intelligence," 750 jurisdictions; dominant consolidator — acquired Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence (closed early 2026) + 4CRisk. Powers AuditBoard/others. No dev integration. Watch item: agentic APIs.
  • Corlytics + Clausematch (corlytics.com): the ONLY incumbent explicitly doing obligation->control gap analysis + LLM remediation suggestions — but against policy documents, not live systems.
  • Norm Ai (norm.ai, $48M, Citi/Bain/Blackstone/Vanguard): most technically ambitious "law-as-code" — regs into executable programs + LLM agents. But reviews artifacts/documents, no dev-system done-vs-gap, no build backlog. Best-funded threat if it pivots to systems verification.
  • Regology / Reggi AI (regology.com): CLOSEST single vendor to "raw law -> controls/requirements generation"; AI agents "generate obligations, risks, controls, and policies" from tracked laws in 135+ countries. But maps to internal policies, no dev integration.
  • 6clicks "Hailey" (6clicks.com): AI crosswalk/gap analysis, but maps to pre-existing framework libraries, not raw statute; no dev systems.
  • UCF (unifiedcompliance.com) & SCF (securecontrolsframework.com): incumbent common-control backbones GRC tools license. UCF's patented NLP decomposing raw regulation into atomic mandates is PRIOR ART. Both static curated catalogs, no live systems.